Time-to-Power market profile
Use this page to decide whether Ohio / PJM belongs in active diligence now, which county and metro pages deserve the first trust check, and whether the Ohio / PJM Time-to-Power Pack is justified before deeper queue, utility, and land work begins.
Ohio / PJM is publicly sellable now, but this page should keep mixed-authority power caveats visible. It is not proof that every county, utility route, or PJM-related signal carries equal confidence or equal execution certainty.
Need the trust rules first? Review the public methodology.
Shortlist verdict
Ohio / PJM has enough current public proof to justify shortlist work now, but the next diligence step should focus on water risk, availability, and regulatory constraints.
Top opportunity
Power proxy supports shortlist potential
Top blocker
Water risk needs deeper validation
Fundamentals card
What changed recently
Blocking-family cards
Confidence impact
Strengthens shortlist confidence
What this family means
Whether electricity route quality is strong enough to support shortlist confidence and near-term diligence.
Current read
Power proxy supports shortlist potential
4 power records informed this scope; queue and grid proxy signals support screening viability.
Confidence impact
Strengthens shortlist confidence
What this family means
Whether fiber and network route quality support AI workload viability and carrier strategy.
Current read
Connectivity proxy supports network access posture
4 connectivity records indicate supporting network infrastructure proxies.
Confidence impact
Constraint signal is current
What this family means
Whether water availability and regulatory pressure could slow or disqualify candidate routes.
Current read
Water risk penalty applied
2 water context records contributed to a risk penalty for screening conservatism.
Confidence impact
Constraint signal is current
What this family means
Whether environmental and climate hazard exposure could create screening or underwriting drag.
Current read
Hazard risk penalty applied
6 hazard records indicate climate and event exposure requiring mitigation allowance.
Confidence impact
Strengthens shortlist confidence
What this family means
Whether labor depth and workforce support improve buildability and operations confidence.
Current read
Labor support signal observed
2 labor records support staffing feasibility at county/metro scale.
Confidence impact
Strengthens shortlist confidence
What this family means
Whether policy and incentive support strengthen the route for deeper diligence and deployment.
Current read
Incentive bonus applied from available program registry
2 incentive records contributed to bonus scoring under current manual-first registry.
Timing truth
The timing basis for the Ohio / PJM Time-to-Power Pack. Proxy and unresolved rows are visible, not hidden.
Timing confidence
Medium
pack-level timing confidence grade
Queue-linked
No — proxy or unresolved rows present
whether all resolved rows are queue-linked
Direct vs proxy
80 proxy
sample row basis breakdown
Freshest as of
Unavailable
latest underlying TTPS refresh
Basis: Pack TTPS-band proxy basis
Current sample timing still depends on proxy basis rather than queue-linked evidence.
Timing is usable for pack framing, but proxy rows need visible separation.
PJM queue data
directOhio / PJM timing evidence uses the official PJM Planning API public export — a direct-fact queue copy. Row-level queue evidence supports stronger timing confidence than proxy-only markets.
Queue evidence freshness
Public summary from the queue evidence bridge. Full row-level evidence, exports, and decision memos stay inside the paid pack/watchlist flow.
Data freshness
Aging (22d old, as of Apr 25, 2026)
Data as of: Apr 25, 2026
Coverage
9,251 rows
9,251 timing signals · 0 change events
Confidence: High
Latest-change teaser
PJM Capacity Price declined 5.7% in PJM Western. PJM Western hub capacity prices declined 5.7% as new generation came online.
Last change date: Feb 24, 2026
Source contract
PJM Planning API interconnection queue export
Source slug: pjm-interconnection-queue
Truth class: Direct Fact
Source tier: Official Public Export
Limitation language
PJM queue evidence comes from the official public Planning API export. Use it as screening-grade decision support only; it does not guarantee parcel-level MW, utility-certified serviceability, interconnection timing, permitting outcomes, or power availability.
Need the row-level evidence?
The paid pack/watchlist includes shortlist rows, source appendix, exports, and decision-memo fields.
Trust Panel
Use this panel to see what is direct fact, what is aging, what remains selective, and what still needs deeper diligence before you treat the shortlist as a market commitment.
Published
Mar 12, 2026, 02:09 PM GMT+2
Current published release
Confidence
Medium confidence (66 / 100)
How much trust to place in the current screening surface
Freshness
Current
What still looks current versus what needs a refresh check
Truth class
Published market-level screening object
Methodology power-ready-sites-methodology-v1.1.0
Evidence surfaced
240 evidence items
Signals kept visible instead of hidden behind a score
Timing basis
Pack TTPS-band proxy basis
How timing confidence is derived for this surface
Evidence type
Direct fact
Queue or official source data
Queue source
PJM Planning API interconnection queue export
Source tier: official public export
Last meaningful change
Feb 24, 2026
Date of last material signal update
Limitation statement
PJM queue evidence comes from the official public Planning API export. Use it as screening-grade decision support only; it does not guarantee parcel-level MW, utility-certified serviceability, interconnection timing, permitting outcomes, or power availability.
Review which source families are current, aging, or stale before treating the shortlist as current truth.
This market page is strong enough to guide where county, metro, and pack-level diligence should begin next.
It does not confirm parcel-level deliverability, permitting certainty, or binding utility commitments.
Before you buy this Time-to-Power Pack
Sample shortlist rows, export preview, and launchability evidence are visible before purchase. Use the public market, county, and metro pages to confirm this market deserves deeper diligence before you move into checkout.
Start with the highest-signal county and metro pages in this market before deciding the Time-to-Power Pack is the next step.
Compare counties and metrosConfirm the trust model, freshness posture, and what this market page does not claim before moving into a paid surface.
Review methodology on this pageThe market-specific offer page now carries the sample/proof language, Time-to-Power Pack scope, and buying route for this market.
View Ohio / PJM Time-to-Power PackSample shortlist rows, export preview, and launchability evidence are visible before purchase. Open the market-specific offer page first when you need proof and scope. Buy the pack when you need a concrete shortlist and export-ready diligence layer. Use the watchlist when you need recurring signal monitoring after initial screening.
Use these county pages to separate real Ohio site-selection signal from broad PJM relevance before shortlist decisions get more expensive.
Current published release
Current published release
Current published release
Current published release
Current published release
Current published release
Current published release
Current published release
Current published release
Current published release
Current published release
Current published release
Current published release
Current published release
Current published release
Current published release
Current published release
Current published release
Current published release
Current published release
Current published release
Current published release
Current published release
Current published release
Current published release
Current published release
Current published release
Current published release
Current published release
Use these metro pages to judge whether the broader Ohio / PJM route is strong enough to support diligence now while keeping mixed-authority power caveats visible.
Current published release
Deterministic component model: opportunity components add upside, risk components apply deductions, and confidence is aggregated separately from score.
Methodology version: power-ready-sites-methodology-v1.1.0. This market summary covers published county and metro intelligence only.
This score helps early screening, not permitting approval, utility commitment, or parcel-level constructability.