Who this is for
Site developers, infrastructure investors, utility-facing teams, and underwriting analysts making first-pass deployment decisions across ERCOT, PJM, Southeast, and Carolinas markets.
Canonical Paid Decision Artifact
Time-to-Power Pack
Ongoing speed-to-power monitoring for site selection. The pack delivers a ranked shortlist with timing confidence and evidence trail — then the watchlist keeps the shortlist current as interconnection queues, utility tariffs, and moratoriums evolve.
The expensive question it answers
Which candidates in this market are most likely to deliver firm power on a financeable timeline, and where should deeper diligence start?
Delivered fields
Every pack row includes these fields. Proxy-based and thin-evidence rows are labeled, not hidden.
Rank
Priority position in the shortlist based on composite timing and readiness signals.
Geography
Market, state, county, metro, ISO / utility footprint.
Readiness score and band
Composite screening score with A / B / C / D band classification.
Energization window band
Near-term, medium-term, long-term, or uncertain — derived from timing basis, not invented.
Timing confidence
High, medium, or low — reflects evidence quality, not optimism.
Timing basis
Direct fact, curated fact, screening proxy, or derived synthesis.
Direct vs proxy flag
Whether the row uses queue-linked evidence or a proxy fallback.
Source freshness
Data-as-of date and freshness status (fresh, aging, stale).
Queue stage / status
Where applicable — queue position, study phase, or process status from ISO data.
Queue source label
Source slug, truth class, and source tier. ERCOT uses public mirror (curated fact). PJM uses official public export (direct fact).
Primary timing blocker
The single biggest obstacle to energization in this geography.
Top positive signal
The strongest evidence that timing may be favorable.
Evidence count
Number of direct, curated, proxy, and derived signals backing the row.
Known unknowns
What the pack cannot answer — limitations are explicit, not hidden.
Suggested next diligence questions
Concrete questions for utility, permitting, or site-level follow-up.
Source appendix pointer
Links to source evidence for each row.
Export shape
The pack is delivered as an exportable decision artifact, not a raw database query. Available formats:
- PDF — Executive summary + ranked shortlist + source appendix. Ready for IC review or internal distribution.
- CSV — Full row-level export for spreadsheet analysis, internal models, and database import.
- XLSX — Formatted workbook with sheets for shortlist, evidence summary, and source appendix.
Sample rows
These sample rows show the structure and level of detail. Actual paid rows include full evidence, source appendix, and diligence questions.
| County | Band | Confidence | Basis | Window | Primary blocker |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ector County, TX | A | High | Queue-linked (direct) | Near-term | Transmission upgrade timeline |
| Midland County, TX | A | High | Queue-linked (normalized) | Near-term | GIA execution |
| Harris County, TX | B | Medium | Band proxy | Medium-term | Large-load queue congestion |
| Franklin County, OH | B | Medium | Queue-linked (direct) | Medium-term | PJM study backlog |
| Fulton County, GA | C | Low | ISO proxy | Long-term | Utility capacity allocation |
Source appendix — queue source labels
Where queue-derived data appears, the pack includes the source label, truth class, and data-as-of date.
Texas Time-to-Power Pack
ISO / region: ERCOT
Source: ERCOT public mirror (curated fact, public mirror of official GIS)
Data as of: 2026-04-02
Get the Texas Time-to-Power Pack →Georgia / Atlanta Time-to-Power Pack
ISO / region: Southern Company
Source: EIA infrastructure proxy + substation context
Get the Georgia / Atlanta Time-to-Power Pack →Carolinas Time-to-Power Pack
ISO / region: Duke / Dominion
Source: EIA proxy + regional context
Get the Carolinas Time-to-Power Pack →Ohio / PJM Time-to-Power Pack
ISO / region: PJM
Source: PJM Planning API (direct fact, official public export)
Data as of: 2026-04-25
Get the Ohio / PJM Time-to-Power Pack →What the pack does not guarantee
- Parcel-boundary MW availability or guaranteed power capacity at any specific site.
- Guaranteed interconnection timing or study completion date.
- Guaranteed energization date or utility commitment to serve.
- Guaranteed permitting outcome — local, state, or federal.
- Utility-certified serviceability or binding power delivery commitment.
The pack is screening-grade decision support. It helps teams decide where to spend deeper diligence time — not to claim confirmed deliverability. Always confirm utility, permitting, and site-specific constraints with qualified advisors.
Ongoing monitoring: Speed-to-Power Watchlist
The pack and watchlist work together as ongoing speed-to-power monitoring for site selection. Once the pack establishes your shortlist baseline, the watchlist tracks every material change — queue status shifts, timing window moves, moratorium proposals — assigning severity and action labels (advance, monitor, downgrade, avoid) so your team always knows the current position.
See how the watchlist keeps your shortlist current →