Published compare set
4
county and metro objects in this market
Time-to-Power compare object
Compare counties and metros in Texas
Compare county and metro routes using Bankable Time-to-Power Intelligence: timing basis, confidence, energization windows, and next-step routing.
It compares only published county and metro screening objects. It does not add parcel-level utility certainty, site deliverability, or permitting guarantees.
Buy Texas Time-to-Power PackBack to market pageOpen weekly change objectOpen Speed-to-Power Watchlist
Need the scoring rules first? Review the public methodology.
Average score
46.2 / 100
published compare objects only
Compare first
Harris County, TX
best county route right now
Compare against
Houston
best metro route right now
Compare these first
Harris County, TX
County · TX county route
Score
63.0
Top opportunity
Power proxy supports shortlist potential
Top blocker
Water risk needs deeper validation
power: Needs refreshconnectivity: Needs refreshwater: Needs refresh
Timing truth
Medium confidenceProxy basis present
Basis: Pack TTPS-band proxy basis
Ratio: 8 proxy
Current sample timing still depends on proxy basis rather than queue-linked evidence.
Timing is usable for pack framing, but proxy rows need visible separation.
Compare these first
Houston
Metro · TX metro route
Score
45.8
Top opportunity
Power proxy supports shortlist potential
Top blocker
Water risk needs deeper validation
power: Needs refreshconnectivity: Needs refreshwater: Needs refresh
Timing truth
Medium confidenceProxy basis present
Basis: Pack TTPS-band proxy basis
Ratio: 8 proxy
Current sample timing still depends on proxy basis rather than queue-linked evidence.
Timing is usable for pack framing, but proxy rows need visible separation.
Full compare grid
Normalize the published county and metro routes in one view
Use this grid to compare score, confidence, freshness, family freshness, blocker signals, and Time-to-Power Pack fit before you move into the paid artifact.
| Rank | Type | Route | Score | Confidence | Freshness | Power / Connectivity / Water | Timing confidence | Timing basis | Top blocker | Top opportunity | Pack fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | County | Harris County, TX Current published release | 63.0 | B confidence (66 / 100) | Needs refresh | power: Needs refreshconnectivity: Needs refreshwater: Needs refresh | Medium | Pack TTPS-band proxy basis8 proxyProxy basis present | Water risk needs deeper validation | Power proxy supports shortlist potential | Use as Speed-to-Power Watchlist context |
| 2 | Metro | Houston Current published release | 45.8 | B confidence (66 / 100) | Needs refresh | power: Needs refreshconnectivity: Needs refreshwater: Needs refresh | Medium | Pack TTPS-band proxy basis8 proxyProxy basis present | Water risk needs deeper validation | Power proxy supports shortlist potential | Use as Speed-to-Power Watchlist context |
| 3 | Metro | Ercot Metro Current published release | 38.0 | C confidence (59 / 100) | Needs refresh | power: Needs refreshconnectivity: Needs refreshwater: Needs refresh | Medium | Pack TTPS-band proxy basis8 proxyProxy basis present | Water risk needs deeper validation | Power proxy supports shortlist potential | Use as Speed-to-Power Watchlist context |
| 4 | Metro | Dallas Fort Worth Current published release | 38.0 | C confidence (60 / 100) | Needs refresh | power: Needs refreshconnectivity: Needs refreshwater: Needs refresh | Medium | Pack TTPS-band proxy basis8 proxyProxy basis present | Water risk needs deeper validation | Power proxy supports shortlist potential | Use as Speed-to-Power Watchlist context |
How to use this page
Start with the highest-ranked county and metro routes, then open the strongest public pages before deciding the Time-to-Power Pack is the next step.
What this page means
It gives you one decision surface for public county and metro screening so you can compare apples to apples on score, trust posture, and blocker signals.
What it does not mean
It does not replace site-level diligence, utility confirmation, parcel screening, or binding infrastructure commitments.
Compare the public routes now, then open the Time-to-Power Pack when the shortlist is real
Sample shortlist rows and sample export preview are visible before purchase. Open the market-specific offer page first when you need proof and scope. Buy the pack when you need a concrete shortlist and export-ready diligence layer. Use the watchlist when you need recurring signal monitoring after initial screening.
Queue evidence freshness
Texas: source freshness and process posture
Public summary from the queue evidence bridge. Full row-level evidence, exports, and decision memos stay inside the paid pack/watchlist flow.
Data freshness
Stale (45d old, as of Apr 2, 2026)
Data as of: Apr 2, 2026
Coverage
1,846 rows
1,846 timing signals · 0 change events
Confidence: Medium
Latest-change teaser
ERCOT Spot Price rose 16.8% in ERCOT Houston. ERCOT Houston hub spot prices increased 16.8% week-over-week due to higher demand and lower wind output.
Last change date: Feb 24, 2026
Source contract
ERCOT public mirror of official GIS queue data
Source slug: ercot-queue-public-mirror
Truth class: Curated Fact
Source tier: Public Mirror Of Official Gis
Limitation language
ERCOT queue evidence uses a secondary public mirror of official ERCOT GIS data. Use it as screening-grade decision support only; it does not guarantee parcel-level MW, utility-certified serviceability, interconnection timing, permitting outcomes, or power availability.
Need the row-level evidence?
The paid pack/watchlist includes shortlist rows, source appendix, exports, and decision-memo fields.
ERCOT queue data
proxyTexas timing evidence currently uses a curated public mirror of official ERCOT GIS data. This is not direct official ERCOT ingestion. Mirror data supports screening-grade decisions; validate with direct utility diligence before committing.
Limitations
This score helps early screening, not permitting approval, utility commitment, or parcel-level constructability.
- Screening outputs do not guarantee utility deliverability or energization timing.
- Parcel-level zoning, title, and entitlement diligence is outside this scoring model.
- Incentive eligibility may depend on case-specific legal and tax review.
Expand all limitations
- Screening outputs do not guarantee utility deliverability or energization timing.
- Parcel-level zoning, title, and entitlement diligence is outside this scoring model.
- Incentive eligibility may depend on case-specific legal and tax review.
- Pack preview summarizes screening signals and is not an investment recommendation.
- Public market summaries include county/metro scorecards only; site candidates remain internal_only.
- Decision support only. Not a utility commitment, parcel-level MW guarantee, interconnection guarantee, energization-date guarantee, or permitting guarantee.